One of the assets of mgm is dedicated quality for software, including especially portal technology for applications with high-safety and reliance demands. In the first blog within this series, “Using Domain Specific Languages to Implement Interactive Frontends“, we described an approach using a specification language (DSL) family on customer level to specify valid inputs and frontend computations for forms-based interactive or batch systems. Let us continue and focus on the quality benefits of this approach.
My colleague Slavomír Jeleň and I are currently working on a logistics management application for an international food retailer. It’s a data-oriented application that performs pre-calculation steps on billions of rows with PL/SQL stored procedures. In order to ensure the correctness of these calculations, we devised a solution for unit testing the stored procedures in Oracle based on DBUnit.
For many years we have dealt with the challenges that frontends with interactive forms pose w.r.t. validation, test data and quality. Describing the requirements in formal Domain Specific Languages (DSL) became the way of choice to create a specification that gives a twofold benefit: first, the customer understands it better, and secondly, the software engineers use the specification not only to implement more resilient software, but also to improve quality assurance. This new series will explain how we do it and why we think it’s the best approach.
This second part of our blog series continues with the topic of direct involvement of customers and gives some practical examples of when, where and how to introduce and include your customer into JIRA. We will then discuss two of mgm’s proven real-world workflows and use them as case studies about appropriate modes for successful customer participation. You will also learn about our recommended ways of keeping the complexity of huge JIRA projects from the customer.
This two-part series shows how JIRA can be used for other things than just bug tracking and presents mgm’s experiences with embracing JIRA in nearly all parts of traditional and agile project lifecycles, resulting in a number of customized, optimized JIRA workflows and processes. In this first part, I will give you an overview of challenges we faced over the years and how we adapted JIRA to meet them. You will get a taste of the vast variety of uses we have found for JIRA and understand why we decided to use only one tool instead of many.
This part explains some of the sophisticated software technology that is working behind the scenes in our rule-based test-data generator for form-centric applications. You will see that a simple enumeration of all possible ways to fill in a form is likely doomed to run longer than the age of the universe. Therefore more efficient techniques are needed to make the seemingly impossible possible.
The previous part discussed why a unit test for a class should be written by the developer of that class, and why a functional test should be created by an independent tester. This posting argues that functional tests should not be part of the build process of the product, but instead should be developed and executed separately. For this, I give guidelines for setting up an independent validation system.
This part addresses the question what makes test data valuable for functional tests. You will understand the important concept of extreme and special values, and how to obtain test data that is highly compressed and also attains a high test coverage. The article also explains our novel idea for constructing a generator for such high-quality test data.
Over the past few years I have noticed that the distinction between functional tests and unit tests has blurred in a lot of projects. I think that using the features of modern testing frameworks like JUnit and TestNG to push functional tests into unit tests is the wrong approach, because it shifts the focus of the test from the test perspective to the development perspective. In this blog post, I explain in detail how I have come to this conclusion.
A lot of our web applications contain a large number of forms with hundreds of fields and complex cross-field constraints. mgm’s quality assurance team uses rule bases and automatic form validation to verify the correctness of these apps. This blog series discusses the challenges in generating test data for this verification and explains our automated process for producing masses of test data by utilizing the rule bases.